AI & agentic products
Product vision, orchestration, human/agent interaction, controls, evals, guardrails, and productionisation.
I take agentic AI from pilot to production with insurers and pension providers: operating models, controls and products that self improve and evolve continuously.
Applied AI Head: UK insurance analysis and product management at a global technology services firm, Edinburgh.
Product vision, orchestration, human/agent interaction, controls, evals, guardrails, and productionisation.
London Market, broking, underwriting, treaty reinsurance, and insurance operating models.
Retirement journeys, guidance and advice, cash-flow modelling, and complex regulated product propositions.
Product strategy, discovery, operating-model design, business architecture, and multi-team delivery.
AI product lead
An agentic operating model for broking: specialised agents on domain-driven boundaries handling submission triage, market matching, and follow-up, with evaluations, guardrails, and explicit human decision points designed into the workflow rather than bolted on.
A production-grade platform design proven against real placement workflows. Client and outcome details are confidential – available in conversation.
Product lead
An AI-enabled underwriting workflow: agents prepare, enrich, and pre-assess submissions inside hard domain boundaries; underwriters keep the decision, with the system’s reasoning and evidence attached to every recommendation.
Adopted into the live underwriting process with the risk function’s sign-off. Volume and turnaround figures are confidential – available on request.
Product lead
An AI engine that classifies each calculation against the scheme’s rule base, executes the routine cases automatically, and routes genuine edge cases to a human with its reasoning attached.
Automated 70% of pension calculation routines across 400 schemes. The remaining 30% now arrive at analysts pre-triaged.
Product and delivery lead
A coordination layer of shared quality gates and a single defect taxonomy, so problems surfaced once and were owned once.
Defect rate fell 25% over the programme while delivery pace held.
Automating a workflow keeps the org chart; giving agents work changes it. What that means for how insurers design operations.
DDD was good architecture advice. Once software can act, it becomes risk management.
A human in the loop is a control, not a design. What meaningful oversight of agentic systems actually requires.
The gap between an AI pilot and an agentic product, seen from the product seat rather than the lab.
I have taken that decision through a risk function and into production. Tell me the workflow and the control that worries you, and I will reply within two working days.